Highmark medical policy is intended to serve only as a general reference resource regarding coverage for the services described. This policy does not constitute medical advice and is not intended to govern or otherwise influence medical decisions.
This policy provides information regarding the coverage of, as determined by applicable federal and/or state legislation.
This policy is designed to address medical necessity guidelines that are appropriate for the majority of individuals with a particular disease, illness or condition. Each person’s unique clinical circumstances warrant individual consideration, based upon review of applicable medical records.
The qualifications of the policy will meet the standards of the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) and the Delaware Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS) and all applicable state and federal regulations.
This medical policy outlines Highmark Health Options services for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair/Replacement.
Highmark Health Options (HHO) – Managed care organization serving vulnerable populations that have complex needs and qualify for Medicaid. Highmark Health Options members include individuals and families with low income, expecting mothers, children, and people with disabilities. Members pay nothing to very little for their health coverage. Highmark Health Options currently services Delaware Medicaid: Diamond State Health Plan (DSHP), Delaware Healthy Children Program (DHCP), and Diamond State Health Plan Plus (DSHP) LTSS members.
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair/Replacement (TMVR) – A minimally invasive procedure that uses catheter-based technology that emulates surgical annuloplasty and edge-to-edge repair of regurgitant mitral valves. TMVR is performed on a beating heart with no cardiopulmonary bypass.
Prior Authorization
Prior Authorization may be required. Please validate codes on the Prior Authorization Lookup Tool https://www.highmarkhealthoptions.com/providers/prior-auth-lookup
Procedures
TMVR with a device approved by the United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in mitral valve repair may be considered medically necessary when individual meets ALL of the following criteria:
TMVR with a device approved by the U.S. FDA may be considered medically necessary for individuals with heart failure and moderate-to-severe or severe symptomatic secondary mitral regurgitation despite the use of maximally tolerated guideline-directed medical therapy.
TMVR for repair of a degenerated bio-prosthetic valve (valve-in-valve) with a device approved by U.S. FDA may be considered medically necessary when ALL of the following criteria are met:
TMVR not meeting the criteria as indicated in this policy is considered experimental/investigational and therefore noncovered because the safety and/or effectiveness of this service cannot be established by the available published peer-reviewed literature.
REQUIREMENTS
The professional team must meet ALL of the following requirements:
TMVR must be performed by an interventional cardiologist or a cardiothoracic surgeon. Interventional cardiologist(s) and cardiothoracic surgeon(s) may jointly participate in the intra-operative technical aspects of TMVR as appropriate.
The facility must meet ALL of the following requirements:
NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION (NYHA) CLASSIFICATION OF HEART FAILURE
Class |
Description |
Class I |
No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue breathlessness, fatigue, or palpitations. |
Class II |
Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest, but ordinary physical activity results in undue breathlessness, fatigue, or palpitations |
Class III |
Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest, but less than ordinary physical activity results in undue breathlessness, fatigue, or palpitations. |
Class IV |
Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms at rest can be present. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased. |
STAGES OF SECONDARY MITRAL REGURGITATION (MR)
Grade |
Definition |
Symptoms |
A |
At risk of MR |
Symptoms due to coronary ischemia or HF may be present that respond to revascularization and appropriate medical therapy. |
B |
Progressive MR |
Symptoms due to coronary ischemia or HF may be present that respond to revascularization and appropriate medical therapy. |
C |
Asymptomatic severe MR |
Symptoms due to coronary ischemia or HF may be present that respond to revascularization and appropriate medical therapy. |
D |
Symptomatic severe MR |
HF symptoms to MR persist even after revascularization and optimization of medical therapy, decreased exercise tolerance, exertional dyspnea. |
PROFESSIONAL STATEMENTS AND SOCIETAL POSITIONS GUIDELINES
The American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association - 2020
The American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association in the 2020 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease.
A mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair is of benefit to patients with severely symptomatic primary mitral regurgitation who are at high or prohibitive risk for surgery, as well as to a select subset of patients with secondary mitral regurgitation who remain severely symptomatic despite guideline-directed management and therapy for heart failure.
Mkalaluh S, Szczeckowicz M, Karck M, Weyman A. Failed MitraClip therapy: surgical revision in high-risk patients. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;14:75
Nishimura RA, O'Gara PT, Bavaria JE, Brindis RG, et al. 2019 AATS/ACC/ASE/SCAI/STS expert consensus[KO1] systems of care document: a proposal to optimize care for patients with valvular heart disease: A joint report of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Cardiology, American Society of Echocardiography, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. JAm Coll Cardiol 2019;73(20):2609-2635.
Atianzar, KK, Zhang, MM, Newhart, ZZ, Gafoor, SS. Why did COAPT win while MITRA-FR failed? Defining the appropriate patient population for MitraClip. Intery Cardiol, 2019;14(1).
Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. JAm Coll Cardiol. 2021;77(4):e25 197.
Kumar A, Al-Khafaji J, Shariff M, et al. Percutaneous mitral valve repair for secondary mitral valve regurgitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Intern Med. 2020.
Lung B, Armoiry X, Vahanian A, et al. Percutaneous repair or medical treatment for secondary mitral regurgitation: outcomes at 2 years. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21(12):1619-1627.
Buzzatti N, Van Hemelrijck M, Denti P, et al. Transcatheter or surgical repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation in elderly patients: A propensity-weighted analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;158(1):86-94.e1.
Thyregod HGH, Ihlemann N, Jorgensen TH, et al. Five-year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes from the nordic aortic valve intervention (notion) randomized clinical trial in lower surgical risk patients. Circ. 2019.
National Institute For Health And Care Excellence. Interventional procedure overview of valve-in-valve TAVI for aortic bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (IP 1013/2 [IPG653]). June 2019. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg653/evidence/overview-final-pdf-6834685357. Accessed March 09, 2021.
National Institute For Health And Care Excellence.Valve-in-valve TAVI for aortic bioprosthetic valve dysfunction, Interventional procedures guidance [IPG653]. June 2019. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg653. Accessed March 08, 2021.
Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services. Decision Memo for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) (CAG-00430R). https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-decision-memo.aspx?NCAld=293&bc=ACAAAAAAQAAA& Accessed March 08, 2021.
Hayes, Inc. Hayes Medical Technology Directory Report. Comparative effectiveness review of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (tavi) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for Aortic Stenosis in Lower Risk Patients. Lansdale, PA: Hayes, Inc.; September, 2020.
Sengupta A, Yazdchi F, Alexis SL, et al. Reoperative mitral surgery versus transcatheter mitral valve replacement:a systematic review. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2021; 10:e0198
[KO1]Updated references