Medical Policy

D-1156-003

Policy Id

HHO-DE-MP-1156

Topic

Treatment of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding and Fibroids

Section

Reproductive Health

Effective Date

Jun 16, 2025

Issued Date

May 16, 2025

Last Revision Date

05/2025

Annual Review

05/2026

Prepared By

J Fletcher

DISCLAIMER

Highmark medical policy is intended to serve only as a general reference resource regarding coverage for the services described. This policy does not constitute medical advice and is not intended to govern or otherwise influence medical decisions.

POLICY STATEMENT

This policy provides information regarding the coverage of, as determined by applicable federal and/or state legislation. 

This policy is designed to address medical necessity guidelines that are appropriate for the majority of individuals with a particular disease, illness or condition. Each person’s unique clinical circumstances warrant individual consideration, based upon review of applicable medical records.

The qualifications of the policy will meet the standards of the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) and the Delaware Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS) and all applicable state and federal regulations. 

Policy Position

Prior Authorization

Prior Authorization may be required. Please validate codes on the Prior Authorization Lookup Tool https://www.highmarkhealthoptions.com/providers/prior-auth-lookup

Procedures

Transcatheter uterine artery embolization (UAE) of uterine arteries may be considered medically necessary for the treatment of uterine fibroids when any ONE of the following criteria is met:

·         The individual is experiencing the following symptoms:

o    Menorrhagia (excessive menstrual bleeding lasting more than eight (8) days) as a direct result of the fibroid (i.e., not resulting from hyperplasia, atypia, or cancer) that interferes with daily activities or causes anemia; or

o    Pelvic pain or pressure as a direct result of the fibroid; or

o    Lower back pain as a direct result of the fibroid; or

o    Urinary symptoms (e.g., urinary frequency, urgency) related to compression of the bladder as a direct result of the fibroid; or

o    Gastrointestinal symptoms related to compression of the bowel (e.g., constipation, bloating) as a direct result of the fibroid; or

o    Dyspareunia (painful or difficult sexual relations) as a direct result of the fibroid; or

o    An abdominally palpable fibroid; or

o    Postpartum uterine hemorrage; or

o    Placenta accreta, placenta increta or placenta percreta.

Or

 

·         The individual is asymptomatic with an abdominally palpable fibroid or significantly enlarged fibroid on abdominal/vaginal examination and any ONE of the following:

o    The use of anesthesia places the individual at high surgical risk; or

o    The individual has medical contraindications to hysterectomy (e.g., morbid obesity); or

o    The use of hormonal therapy is contraindicated, or the individual is intolerant to or has previously failed a course of hormone therapy; or

o    The individual wishes to avoid hysterectomy; or

o    The individual may want to become pregnant; or

o    The individual has hydronephrosis.

 

One repeat transcatheter embolization of uterine arteries may be considered medically necessary to treat persistent symptoms of uterine fibroids after an initial uterine artery embolization when any ONE of the following criteria is met:

·         Documentation of continued symptoms such as bleeding or pain; or

·         Individual has persistent symptoms in combination with findings on imaging of an incomplete initial procedure, as evidenced by continued blood flow to the treated regions.

 

UAE may be considered medically necessary for the treatment of postpartum uterine hemorrhage.

 

Laparoscopic or transcervical ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (e.g., Acessa™, Sonata) for the treatment of uterine fibroids may be considered medically necessary when the individual is experiencing any ONE of the following symptoms:

 

·         Menorrhagia (excessive menstrual bleeding lasting more than eight (8) days) as a direct result of the fibroid (e.g., not resulting from hyperplasia, atypia, or cancer) that interferes              with daily activities or causes anemia; or

·         Pelvic pain or pressure as a direct result of the fibroid; or

·         Lower back pain as a direct result of the fibroid; or

·         Urinary symptoms (e.g., urinary frequency, urgency) related to compression of the bladder as a direct result of the fibroid; or

·         Gastrointestinal symptoms related to compression of the bowel (e.g., constipation, bloating) as a direct result of the fibroid; or

·         Dyspareunia (painful or difficult sexual relations) as a direct result of the fibroid; or

·         An abdominally palpable fibroid.

 

Laparoscopic or transcervical ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation not meeting the criteria as indicated in this policy is considered experimental/investigational and therefore non-covered because the safety and/or effectiveness have not been established by the available published peer-reviewed literature.

 

Endometrial ablation with or without hysteroscopic guidance, using an FDA-approved device, may be considered medically necessary in women who would otherwise be considered candidates for hysterectomy when any ONE of the following criteria is met:

·         In women with menorrhagia who are not candidates for hormone therapy; or

·         Decline hormone therapy; or

·         Who are unresponsive to hormone therapy.

 

Endometrial ablation with or without hysteroscopic guidance for all other indications is considered not medically necessary.

Treatment of uterine fibroids is considered experimental/investigational and, therefore, non-covered because the safety and/or effectiveness of this service cannot be established by the available published peer-reviewed literature for any ONE of the following procedure/services.

  • Laparoscopic and percutaneous techniques for myolysis (e.g., laser and bipolar needles, cryomyolysis); or
  • Laparoscopic uterine power morcellation in hysterectomy and myomectomy; or
  • MRI guidance performed in conjunction with percutaneous myolysis of uterine fibroids. 

Post Payment Audit Statement

The medical record must include documentation that reflects the medical necessity criteria and is subject to audit by Highmark Health Options at any time pursuant to the terms of your provider agreement.

Place of Service: Outpatient

Experimental/investigational (E/I) services are not covered regardless of place of service.

Treatment of Uterine Fibroids is typically an outpatient procedure which is only eligible for coverage as an inpatient procedure in special circumstances, including, but not limited to, the presence of a comorbid condition that would require monitoring in a more controlled environment such as the inpatient setting.

REIMBURSEMENT

Participating facilities will be reimbursed per their Highmark Health Options contract. 

CPT code

Description

36245

Selective catheter placement, arterial system; each first order abdominal, pelvic, or lower extremity artery branch, within a vascular family.

36246

Selective catheter placement, arterial system; initial second order abdominal, pelvic, or lower extremity artery branch, within a vascular family.

36247

Selective catheter placement, arterial system; initial third order or more selective abdominal, pelvic, or lower extremity artery branch, within a vascular family.

36248

Selective catheter placement, arterial system; additional second order, third order, and beyond, abdominal, pelvic, or lower extremity artery branch, within a vascular family (list in addition to code for initial second or third order vessel as appropriate).

37243

Vascular embolization or occlusion, inclusive of all radiological supervision and interpretation, intraprocedural road mapping, and imaging guidance necessary to complete the intervention; for tumors, organ ischemia, or infarction.

37244

Vascular embolization or occlusion, inclusive of all radiological supervision and interpretation, intraprocedural road mapping, and imaging guidance necessary to complete the intervention; for arterial or venous hemorrhage or lymphatic extravasation.

 

 

58140

 

 

Myomectomy, excision of fibroid tumor(s) of uterus, 1 to 4 intramural myoma(s) with total weight of 250 g or less and/or removal of surface myomas; abdominal approach

 

 

58145

 

 

Myomectomy, excision of fibroid tumor(s) of uterus, 1 to 4 intramural myoma(s) with total weight of 250 g or less and/or removal of surface myomas; vaginal approach

 

 

58580

 

 

Transcervical ablation of uterine fibroid(s), including intraoperative ultrasound guidance and monitoring, radiofrequency

58353

Endometrial ablation, thermal, without hysteroscopic guidance.

58356

Endometrial cryoablation with ultrasonic guidance, including endometrial curettage, when performed.

58563

Hysteroscopy, surgical; with endometrial ablation (e.g., endometrial resection, electrosurgical ablation, thermoablation).

58674

Laparoscopy, surgical, ablation of uterine fibroid(s) including intraoperative ultrasound guidance and monitoring, radiofrequency.

77022

Magnetic resonance imaging guidance for, and monitoring of, parenchymal tissue ablation.

 

COVERED DIAGNOSIS CODES FOR PROCEDURE CODE 58674

Codes

 

 

 

 

 

 

D25.0

D25.1

D25.2

D25.9

 

 

 

 

NONCOVERED DIAGNOSIS CODES FOR PROCEDURE CODES 58578, 77022

Codes

 

 

 

 

 

 

D25.0

D25.1

D25.2

D25.9

 

 

 

 

COVERED DIAGNOSIS CODES FOR PROCEDURE CODES 58353, 58356, AND 58563

Codes

 

 

 

 

 

 

N92.0

N92.1

N92.4

 

 

 

 

References

ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. 2017(81). Reaffirmed 2018. Accessed July 25, 2018.

 

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin. Alternatives to hysterectomy in the management of leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol. Aug 2008;112(2 Pt 1):387-400. Reaffirmed in 2019.

 

Barnard EP, AbdElmagied AM, Vaughan LE, et al. Periprocedural outcomes comparing fibroid embolization and focused ultrasound: A randomized controlled trial and comprehensive cohort analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(5): 500.e1-500.e11.

 

Chudnoff S, Guido R, Roy K, Levine D, Mihalov L, Garza-Leal J. Ultrasound-Guided transcervical ablation of uterine leiomyomas. Obstet Gyn. 2019;133(1):13-22.

 

Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 183: Postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(4): e168-e186.

 

Davis MR, Soliman AM, Castelli-Haley J, et al. Reintervention Rates After Myomectomy, Endometrial Ablation, and Uterine Artery Embolization for Patients with Uterine Fibroids. J Womens Health (Larchmt). Oct 2018; 27(10):1204-1214.

 

Gingold JA, Gueye NA, Falcone T. Minimally invasive approaches to myoma management. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2018;25(2):237-250.

 

Havryliu Y, Setton R, Carlow JJ, Shaktman BD. Symptomatic fibroid management: Systematic review of the literature. JSLS. 2017;21(3): e2017.00041.

 

Havryliuk Y, Setton R, Carlow JJ, Shaktman BD. Symptomatic fibroid management: systematic review of the literature. JSLS. 2017;21(3): e2017.00041.

 

Hayes Technology Assessment. Laparascopic radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation (Acessa) for treatment of uterine fibroids. Lansdale, PA: Hayes, Inc. Nov. 17, 2020.

 

Hayes Technology Assessment. Transcervial raidiofrequency ablation with the Sonata System for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Lansdale, PA. Hayes, Inc. Nov. 17, 2020.

 

Hayes, Inc. Health Technology Breif. Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Volumetric Thermal Ablation (Acessa System; Halt Medical Inc.) for Treatment of Uterine Fibroids. November 3, 2017. Accessed February 5, 2018.

 

Keltz J, Levie M, Chudnoff S. Pregnancy outcomes after direct uterine myoma thermal ablation: Review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(4):538-545.

 

Laughlin-Tommaso SK. Nonsurgical management of myomas. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2018;25(2):229-236.

 

McCausland V, McCausland A, Barbis S. Partial endometrial ablation: A 10-20-year follow-up of impact on bleeding, pain, and quality of life. J Gynecol Surg. 2016;32(4),230-235.

 

Sandberg EM, Tummers F, Cohen SL, van den Haak L, Dekkers OM, et al. Reintervention risk and quality of life outcomes after uterine-sparing interventions for fibroids: A systematic review and meta- analysis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(4):698-707.

 

van den Brink MJ, Beelen P, Herman MC, Claassen NJJ, Bongers MY, et al. Women’s preferences for levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding, Eur J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.06.020.

 

Miller CE, Osman KM. Transcervical radiofrequency ablation of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 2-Year results of the SONATA pivotal trial. J Gynecol Surg. 2019;35(6):345-349.

 

Bradley LD, Pasic RP, Miller LE. Clinical performance of radiofrequency ablation for treatment of uterine fibroids: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019;29(12):1507-1517.

 

Lin L, Ma H,m Wang J et al. Quality of life, adverse events and reintervention outcomes after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation for sympotomatic uterine fibroids: A meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(3):409-416.